Staff looking at "personal" and "sensitive" data
By Nick Heath
Published: 1 May 2008 16:47 GMT
The government faced condemnation after it emerged that 600 staff at Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs (HMRC) have been disciplined for snooping on personal data.
The revelation by Treasury minister Jane Kennedy in a written answer to parliament showed that 192 staff had been disciplined last year, 180 in 2006 and 238 in 2005.
The HMRC has discussed 11 data security incidents involving customer information with the Information Commissioner's Office since April 2005, has stopped data transfers unless there is a business critical need and now demands adequate security protection for the transfer of bulk data on removable media such as CDs and memory sticks, she said in a separate answer.
A shadow home affairs spokesman said: "It's shocking that so many public officials have been sacked or disciplined for abusing people's private details.
"It underlines why we believe that the reckless handling of personal data by government officials should be made an offence."
The House of Lords recently backed a motion to make the reckless loss or distribution of data a criminal offence.
Full Disclosure campaign
silicon.com is aiming to make businesses and government take data security more seriously. Read more here.
Kennedy said the breaches related to less than one per cent of just over 90,000 staff.
She said in her written answer: "HMRC has a strict policy forbidding staff to access customer records, unless they have a legitimate business need. Breaches of this policy are taken seriously."
The government-commissioned Poynter Review of the breach that led to the loss of 25 million personal details after a junior employee posted two CDs to the National Audit Office is expected to be published imminently.
Kennedy also said the data guardians brought in to shake-up data security at the HMRC did not have power to operate outside of the existing HMRC chain of command and that business unit directors and the HMRC chairman retained ultimate responsibility for data security.
Why is anyone surprised? - all this means is that ...
Roger Huffadine
If I snooped at government data, I'd be arrested a...
Jay Carney
I'm definately not surprised about this...I have b...
Richard Davies
Thisis the remit of the Operations Support Group, a multi-disciplined resource whichincludes the functions of Real Estate, Construction, Facilities ...
As an Application Project Manager your key area of focus will be Application Management you will work in a multi disciplined team that is a key ...
We have 258,000 miles sq.of selling space and we employ around 11,000 colleagues.Following the 2005 re-branding of all its stores, Comet has ...
Agenda Setters 2008
Welcome to the ninth annual Agenda Setters poll – silicon.com's list of the top 50 most influential individuals in the technology and IT industries, from techies and CIOs to entrepreneurs and business leaders. Find out more in our latest special report.
Stories from the web...
Copyright © 2008 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved. Top of page
silicon.com
Inbox: "Stupendous incompetence" from DfT
"It's a kick in the teeth, paying taxes and having them squandered like this"
Martyn Hart
Shared services to pull public sector through tough times
Comment: Get ready to save
silicon.com
Inbox: Why is Westminster lost for Words?
"Why are they worried about being able to open documents? They'll only lose them or leave them in the back of a taxi"
silicon.com
Inbox: Brits baying for blood over ID
"Biometrics is a way of safeguarding against fraud but it is not that magical solution to identity theft"
Alan Brown
NHS IT to benefit Southern England - at last
Comment: Mental health care app ready for prime time
silicon.com
Inbox: ID guinea pigs, snooping database and CIO standards
"It's the divide and conquer approach, or 'how to eat an elephant'"